Publikacje
Published Papers (Membrane References)
- Minimally invasive alveolar ridge preservation/augmentation procedure (Open Barrier Membrane Technique) [521.20 KB PDF]
Yamashita M, Horita S, Takei N, Sasada Y, Shibato W, Ishikawa Y, Takao K, Maki K, Funakoshi E. Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Preservation/Augmentation Procedure (Open Barrier Membrane Technique). 2010, AAP 96th Annual Meeting. - Immediate implant placement in fresh mandibular molar extraction socket: 8 year results [11.31 MB PDF]
Zafiropoulos GG, Kasaj A, Hoffmann O.
Immediate implant placement in fresh mandibular molar extraction socket: 8 year results. A case report.
J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(2):145-151. - Single-tooth implant placement and loading in fresh and regenerated extraction sockets. Five-year results [1.82 MB PDF]
Zafiropoulos GG, Deli G, Bartee BK, Hoffman O
Single-tooth implant placement and loading in fresh and regenerated extraction sockets. Five-year results:
A case series using two different implant designs
J Periodontol 2010;81:604-15. - Guided bone regeneration using nonexpanded PTFE membranes [2.79 MB PDF]
Barboza EP, Stutz B, Ferreira VF; Carvalho W
Guided bone regeneration using nonexpanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in preparation for dental implant placements-A report of 420 cases.
Implant Dent 2010;19(1):2-7. - Mandibular molar root resection versus implant therapy: A retrospective nonrandomized study. [702.14 KB PDF]
Zafiropoulos GG, Hoffmann O, Kasaj A, Willershausen B, Deli G, Tatakis DN
Mandibular molar root resection versus implant therapy: A retrospective nonrandomized study.
J Oral Implantol 2009;35:52-62. - Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: A clinical and histologic study. [7.85 MB PDF]
Fotek PD, Neiva RF, Wang HL
Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: A clinical and histologic study.
J Periodontol 2009;80:776-785. - Alveolar bone preservation in extraction sockets using non-resorbable dPTFE membranes: A retrospective non-randomized study [759.59 KB PDF]
Hoffman O, Bartee BK, Beaumont C, Kasaj A, Deli G, Zafiropoulos GG. Alveolar bone preservation in extraction sockets using non-resorbable dPTFE membranes: A retrospective non-randomized study.
J Periodontol 2008;79:1355-1369. - Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration [1.86 MB PDF]
Barber HD, Lignelli J, Smith BM, Bartee BK. Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:748-752. - Comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus a xenograft in the treatment of vertical osseous defects: A clinical reentry study. [2.18 MB PDF]
Walters SP, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Pickman K, Scheetz JP
Comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus a xenograft in the treatment of vertical osseous defects: A clinical reentry study.
J Periodontol 2003;74:1161-1168. - Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 1: Rationale and material selection [1.92 MB PDF]
Bartee BK. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 1: Rationale and material selection.
J Oral Implantol 2001;27:187-193. - Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 2: Membrane-assisted surgical technique [920.42 KB PDF]
Bartee BK. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 2: Membrane-assisted surgical technique.
J Oral Implantol 2001;27:194-197. - A comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of class II buccal/lingual furc [7.38 MB PDF]
Lamb JW III, Greenwell H, Drisko C, Henderson RD, Scheetz JP, Rebitski G
A comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of class II buccal/lingual furcation defects: A clinical reentry study.
J Periodontol 2001;72:1580-1587. - Evaluation of a new polytetrafluoroethylene guided tissue regeneration membrane in healing extraction sites. [1.14 MB PDF]
Bartee BK
Evaluation of a new polytetrafluoroethylene guided tissue regeneration membrane in healing extraction sites.
Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:1256-1264. - Evaluation of a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandibl [2.45 MB PDF]
Bartee BK, Carr JA
Evaluation of a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible.
J Oral Implantol 1995;21:88-95.
Published Papers (Suture References)
Published Papers (Bone Scraper References)
